![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I want to look like my avatar
Join Date: Jan Wed 2001
Posts: 1,715
|
Man Jailed for Shooting Off His Testicles
Tue Jul 13, 1:06 PM ET http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...d_testicles_dc LONDON (Reuters) - A British man who accidentally shot himself in the testicles after drinking 15 pints of beer was jailed for five years on Tuesday for possessing an illegal firearm, a court spokesman said. David Walker, 28, was arguing with a friend at a pub in South Yorkshire, northern England, when he went home to get his sawed-off shotgun, which he jammed into his trousers. But as he walked back to the pub, the gun went off, blasting pellets into his testicles. Doctors later removed what remained of his testicles during emergency surgery. Walker admitted possessing a prohibited weapon at a hearing in June at the court in Sheffield. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Fully Qualified Member
Join Date: Jan Wed 2002
Posts: 174
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Quote:
It was the Bobbittizing that made the weapon 'prohibited' rather than just 'unlicenced', which (I think) might only have warranted a fine in some circumstances. Perhaps the shotgun was getting its own back! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
agent provocateur
Join Date: Feb Sat 2001
Posts: 2,329
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Walker is a clear candidate for a Darwin Award. The award is for removing oneself from the gene pool through an incredibly stupid act - preferably before breeding. It doesn't require death, just irreversible sterility. I expect to see a description of Walker in the next book of awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
agent provocateur
Join Date: Feb Sat 2001
Posts: 2,329
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
I want to look like my avatar
Join Date: Jan Wed 2001
Posts: 1,715
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Quote:
Personally, I think the story is a little suspect because a shotgun or any gun shoved in the belt of a man's pants should cause more damage than described. However. if that single shot made him a eunuch, I'm happy for him. He can get a pair of new and larger artificial testicles and never, ever spread his genes or his drunken stupidity to children. Harumph!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
I'm not sure about this, but I think that short-barreled shotguns, that didn't have to be sawed off, were manufactured at one time.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Old Poop
Join Date: Jan Mon 2001
Posts: 6,148
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Well,
According to some, the barrel has to be 18". Anything shorter is practically useless at over 10 yards unless you want to see the expression on their face as they die. So, if it is going to be sawn off for you, make sure that it is sawed off longer than 18" A-1 ![]()
__________________
A-1 __________________ US TV Commentator: "One of the reasons Arnie [Arnold Palmer] is playing so well is that, before each tee-shot, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them... Oh my God, what have I just said?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
I want to look like my avatar
Join Date: Jan Wed 2001
Posts: 1,715
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Quote:
In my very humble opinion, If you are drunk and in a pub (Or bar) argument and you are going to settle the argument with a shotgun, YOU WANT TO SEE THEIR EYES! Most certainly! Now as for shotguns, I don't know. Years ago when I owned several handguns, I bought .22 shot shells for the Ruger I owned. Shot shells were great for rattlesnakes, field mice, and small varmints that could get close to you. And as we all know, just my doing this drove all those varmints out of western Pennsylvania. My other guns were Dan Wesson and Wesson and Colt - .357 mags and .38 specials. While a 357 magnum surely sent a rattlesnake to his maker in spectacular fashion, it was a little overkill becaujse a stray bullet could lodge in your refrigerator and thaw your meat for the evening. . In my humbled opinion, the .22 shot shells did a better job without damaging ones ears... or for that matter infomrning everyone within a half mile that you were shooting again... As for now, there are too many kids around to target practice with abandon, so I sold all the guns. And thinking about it - if I wanted to remove my testicles quickly and relatively painlessly, a shotgun might be efective if you could keep it away from all the other body parts. AFter all, once the testicles are no longer attached tot he body, theyh can't hurt anymore. ![]() Last edited by Dave; 07-16-2004 at 09:52 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Fully Qualified Member
Join Date: Jan Wed 2002
Posts: 174
|
Re: removal from the gene pool
Quote:
He was quite stupid enough having the gun in the street, even without stuffing it down his trousers. The police might still yet link him up with a robbery! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scrotal removal, an OPINION | Andrew | Surgical Castration | 23 | 06-23-2009 11:17 PM |
| Yet another ethical dilemma to ponder... | Jesus | Eunuch Central | 19 | 08-06-2002 08:04 PM |
| Hospital needed informed consent on penis removal | Happousai | Castration in the Arts, News, and Websites | 0 | 05-17-2002 07:58 AM |
| Gene Research and Castration | Khaled | Eunuch Central | 0 | 03-03-2002 02:05 AM |
| Anyone done laser treatment for facial hair removal? | happousai | Eunuch Central | 2 | 02-12-2002 11:52 AM |