Female Urologists
 

This first is located in Texas - Dr.Diane West, M.D.

http://www.urologyinstitute.com/html..._and_impo.html

I'm seeing a female urologist, Dr. Stephanie Cripps, in Vancouver Canada. She doesn't have a picture on a web page, but she looks very much like the one you posted -- she's about 29 years old, dark hair, glasses, pretty.

The more I read about urology, the more I realize that castration is their solution for everything. They remove testicles for testicular cancer, for prostate cancer, testicular torsion, and testicular ruptures.

You can be sure that these female urologists have removed a lot of testicles. That is quite a turn-on for a guy like me. Many urologists average about 10 orchiectomies per month!

Here's an article about the lack of female urologists. But it is changing. The good news is that all the female urologists are also young, because they are just graduating in large numbers recently:

http://www.premierhealthcare.com/cgi...article_id=830

Here's another article about the first female urologist in Illinois:

http://www.dhcancerfoundation.com/news/

This one mentions "the only female urologist in North Carolina":

http://www.msj.org/urology_continence.html

This one shows a young black woman who won a urology scholarship, and also mentions the only female urologist in Richmond VA:

http://www.uro.com/uronews.pdf

I guess female urologists are very rare. It is quite interesting. I definitely prefer a female doctor. They are much more caring, whereas male doctors only take a clinical interest. Furthermore, if someone is going to fondle my genitals or do a digital rectal exam, I refuse to let a guy do that. This new generation of female urologists is realizing that they are in very high demand. My female urologist has a whole waiting room full of men when I visit her.

A babe
 

Sarah, that urologist looks like WonderWoman Linda Carter, what a good looking lady like her examining mens genitals as a profession? Well like they all said she muct have an interest in what she is doing to take it up as a profession, its likely that its allows her to do this and not be seen as degrading.
I am not sure if all urologists will carry out surgical ops and without asking her I would assume she just does the examinations and advice.

There is nothing wrong with a female urologist. I don't exactly know why one would wish to be a urologist, though, but it is none of my business.

There certainly are a lot of male gynecologists. I prefer, though, a female one.

It seems that many men might not have a problem with a female urologist--is that true? And I suppose that there are not many women here who were born that way, but how comfortable are women with male gynecologists? My GP is male, and I'm not bothered by him (just as long as he doesn't probe too much).

Love,
Kelly

All urologists DO do surgical procedures. Urology is a surgical specialty. You can be sure those female urologists have removed many testicles.

But would they castrate on demand?
 

Ah yes, but how many would be willing to do a castration for those who simply desire to be a eunuch, without any other medical reason to justify it. (Although why living 10-15 years longer than intact males is not a good enough reason is beyond me)



:read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1:

Andrew said, "how many would be willing to do a castration for those who simply desire to be a eunuch, without any other medical reason to justify it? "

They wouldn't in general. However, I suggest that you can destroy your testicles yourself by restricting the bloodflow, or injecting DL-lactic acid. Once you acheive significant atrophy due to your self testicular abuse, then you CAN convince a urologist that they need to be removed.

Urologists are actually very eager to remove testicles. They prescribe it as necessary for many conditions. They don't even bother to try to save testicles with lumps in them -- even if they don't know it's cancer they remove the whole thing. If you get prostate cancer, they'll remove both testicles immediately. There are lots of testimonies on the web where a man gets diagnosed with prostate cancer and they schedule bilateral orchiectomy just two days later. Urologists do very little to save testicles, and mainly see them as a source of testosterone which is a bad thing in cancer treatment.

Many are not
 

Have to disagree. Urologists are not all surgeon even thought they may know about surgical ops many do just checkups and advice.
The lump in the testicles, no they dont go and remove the gonads regardless if its cancerouse or not, your information is wrong. If the lump is cancerouse there is 95% chance the lump can be removed.
No they dont remove your nuts because of prostate cancer, they will either give you female hormone jabs to reduce it or remove your prostate, removal of the gonads does not cure an already cancerouse prostate.

Prodtste cancer
 

Although castration will not cure prostate cancer, it will slow it down or stop the growth altogether. Castration used to be used more asggresively then it is now, for various reasons. But used at Stage 1 it usually ends the problem. At stage 2 and 3 it prolongs life. Of course, nowadays chemical castration is far more common.

:read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1: :read1:

Hilander,

I don't know where you get your information from, but it is entirely wrong.

You said that Urologists are not all surgeons. The "What is a Urologist" page on http://www.urologychannel.com/urologist.shtml says: "urology is classified as a surgical subspecialty" and furthermore that certification requires "the entering urological resident who has completed a general surgery program".

You said that they do not remove testicles just for lumps. Again you are quite wrong. Here are some links that show otherwise: On http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH...848.html#treat they state that "ultimately, the best way to confirm the diagnosis of testicular cancer is to perform an orchiectomy (surgical removal of the affected testicle). After surgery, the testicle will be examined in the laboratory to determine if cancer is present, and if so, the specific type. " and furthermore "a radical inguinal orchiectomy is the most common initial treatment for most stages of testicular cancer. " In other words, just to diagnose testicular cancer they perform orchiectomy. There's more about this at: http://www.acor.org/diseases/TC/orch.html where they explain that "they cannot do a biopsy because if it is cancer, they do not want to risk disturbing or spreading the cancer while it is still in the body." In other words, they cannot just cut out the lump because they are worried about spreading the cancer.

Lastly you say they don't remove testicles for prostate cancer. That is also wrong. While there are indeed many chemical alternatives recently, bilateral orchiectomy is still suggested to all prostate patients. There is more information at: http://www.phoenix5.org/Infolink/adv...chiectomy.html which states that "certainly until the late 1980s or even the early 1990s there was no doubt whatsoever that orchiectomy was the gold standard for the hormonal treatment of advanced prostate cancer. At http://www.cancerconsultants.com/RxO...y-Prostate.htm they state that "orchiectomy is a common treatment for patients with metastatic (stage IV) prostate cancer who will likely require hormone therapy for life. Patients may experience a benefit in symptoms in a matter of days following surgery."

So please check your information before accusing me of not knowing what I'm talking about.

An Idea comes to mind...
 

Vasectomy by Female Urologist
 

I had to look long and hard (pun intended) for a female urologist to do my vasectomy. Was a great experience.

Splitdick
 

The website you mentioned were saying this from a hyperthetical point of view. Of couse to determine any part of an organ if it is cancerous is to have it removed and dissected and put under the microscope, this is not about curing a patient directly but in the interest of research. You dont deny someone of a lung if he is suffering from lunhg cancer.
Of course many if all urologists need to be trained in surgical procedures because that is how they get their degrees, they need to understand what the operations involves and give informed decisions to patients, I know because I mets many who dont become surgeon.

Chemical castration is different from having your nuts removed, as you have put it in your previouse post but retracted to suite your arguement. This is the same as having jabs to reduce male hormone or boos female hormone as I said earlier, and no they dont remove your nut to cure prostate cancer, not these days anyway.

Hilander, you are very misinformed. The certainly remove testicles for prostate cancer. Here are several more references to support my claim.

Here is a personal account of a prostate patient, follow the link for the "Flow Chart of Dates" and you will see that he had a bilateral orchiectomy in March of 1999, just two months after his first PSA test. Link is at http://www.ricmasten.com/Prostate.Series.html

WebMD site lists bilateral orchiectomy first on the list of alternatives for men requiring hormone treatment for prostate cancer: http://webmd.lycos.com/content/article/1680.50818

This web site also mentions bilateral orchiectomy first in the list of treatment options: http://www.blackhealthnetwork.com/ar...p?articleid=31

This web site says "bilateral Orchiectomy remains the main method at Stage D". See http://www.sfcs.org.sg/urology/ca-p.html

On this site, bilateral orchiectomy is listed as the first option for hormonal treatment. http://www.prostatehealth.org/patient/fPAT07.html

This site says "bilateral orchiectomy is usually done when you have cancer in your prostate gland". http://www.medformation.com/mf/crsaa.nsf/crs/biorch.htm

Here is a personal story of a guy receiving bilateral orchiectomy for prostate cancer in 1988. http://www.cancerguide.org/jmartin_story.html

This site describes bilateral orchiectomy as a valid treatment option: http://www.ecpcp.org/ecpcp_opt2.htm

Anyways, EVERY single site about prostate cancer mentions bilateral orchiectomy as a treatment option. In the last five years there have been alternatives, but there are still many bilateral orchiectomies performed and you can certainly get it if you request it.

Again, you are entirely wrong about the biopsies for testicular cancer. They DO remove the testicle if there is a lump. Just to do the biopsy, even before they are sure it is cancer. Here is another link to back me up -- it is not just theoretical! http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/6_34.htm says "In nearly all cases of suspected cancer, the entire affected testicle is removed "

This one says "A radical orchiectomy is indicated in the management of a suspected testicular tumor. Suspect a testicular tumor in a patient with the physical findings of a painless, firm, and irregular mass arising from the testicle." http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3063.htm

So where do you get your facts from hilander? I would like to agree with you because I think it is stupid that doctors remove so many testicles -- with a bit of care I am sure they could remove lumps without the whole thing. But they don't. They believe testicles are expendible and there are many quotes that having just one won't affect you at all (unless you find out later that that remaining testicle has fertility problem, etc.)

false information
 

I wouldnt read too much into those website. While all variouse options have been tried throughout the history of testiculer and prostate cancers no medical profession would sanction the idea of cutting your knackers without finding if its treatable, if this happens in the outbacks of certain states in USA were medical malpractice exist then that is another story.
So you believe a man goes to a urologist and they found a lump next they cut both of his bollocks off then decide if they are cancerous? Oh come of it!
I am sorry I just couldnt help myself laughing....please dont add anymore replies to this subject it too hilarouse to devout so much efforts into something concocted by some weirdos whos opinions belongs to another planets and do you no favours when you take their words as face value.