The part where they get ignoredOriginally Posted by Riverwind
for the general welfare of the Federals.
Comprende?
Moi
Re: Dr. Ron Paul, 2012?
The part where they get ignored
for the general welfare of the Federals.
Comprende?
Moi
I totally 'comprende' the constitution, all of it, to bad Paul does not. He only 'comprende' the parts he likes, the rest he would do away with. To bad to change the constitution takes more then an act of congress.
Like all the government agency's he would do away with Education is the deepest cut to freedom that we have. The man is a danger to this country, I am not worried about him as he will never be elected, ever. He is what he has always been a royal pain in the ass.
Maybe you should start by studying American History, start with the revolution and go from there, read the Articles of Confederation and understand what it was about and that is was a failure, then look at Paul again, if you and he understood American History you would understand the Constitution which is now well over 200 years old and has worked well for us.
No I will not take another look at Paul I have already spent more time on him then he deserves.
River
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Edmund Burke
Content-free statement. You should not have bothered. The same statement could be said about his predecessor, and he was provably stupid.
You are so right, its so nice to have a president that speaks the English language. Someone that never gets to high or low, who is up beat. Someone who thinks education is more important then a bigger military budget. Note, the USA spends more on the military then ALL of the other country's in the world put together. Now there is a lot to be said for a military presents but do we really need 13 aircraft carriers? I would think 6 or 7 would be more then enough and at several billion to build and more millions to maintain how much of that is wasted and could be spent better, like education.
River
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Edmund Burke
Vote for Paul.
Romney speaks FRENCH!!!
He did a mission in FRANCE where he ate too many french fries...
A-1
__________________
(See the Avatar above)
(OR, Click below)
It's the NEW CONSERVATIVE Body Modification Craze...
.....
Re: Dr. Ron Paul, 2012?
http://news.yahoo.com/clint-eastwood...134323764.html
" . . Academy award-winning actor Clint Eastwood told The Daily Caller that the Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is “as good as anybody else” in the race but that he will decide on a candidate in another month or two after “listening to all that crap on television.”. . ."
Dirty Harry for Dr. Paul. Not! Truly. Wait and see.
Moi
Clint Eastwood could sway my vote more then Donald
And - much
http://news.yahoo.com/ron-paul-corre...235300770.html
Ron Paul Correctly Distinguishes Between Illegal Entry to the United States and Crime
Even the author sez he is usually anti-Paul but likes this. Please read it.
Anyone disagree with the viewpoint? If you read it that is. Where's Obama?
And in other news Dr. Paul says the Federals should get out of the Western States' land management.
Nevada should deal with its' horse problem. And the Federals as last resort.
His campaign in the west has begun.
Moi
It ain't over, 'till it's over.
Last edited by moi621; 02-03-2012 at 04:33 AM.
Re: Dr. Ron Paul, 2012?
OH GOD!!!
Will I EVER be glad when this election is over and De. Paul dies... er... I mean this thread dies of old age...
FLASH! ...this just in. Newt Gingrinch has more "Chins" than the Honolulu telephone directory...
__________________
(See the Avatar above)
(OR, Click below)
It's the NEW CONSERVATIVE Body Modification Craze...
I heard on one of the talk shows today that Ron Paul will not quit running for some office until some time after he is dead and buried if he gets his way. So it seems that A-1 is both right and wrong. Although, he is sinking in the polls. He will have some delegates at the convention but not enough to demand a big role.
Here's the current polling in NEvada and Arizona:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
It's too big a table to try and insert here.
“They also call it the Winged Isle. Some say it is because the island, if seen from above, would look like butterfly wings. And I do not know the truth of it.” Then, “ ‘And what is truth?’ said jesting Pilate.” From: The Truth Is A Cave In The Black Mountains by Neil Gaiman.
Ok I looked at the polls, and Paul finishes last in everyone of them sucking hind tit as it were.
So I ask the questions, actually A-1 asked the question but I will make it offical
Should we close this thread as we are tired of hearing about Paul?
Yes or No will do, I don't need any foul mouth comments.
River
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Edmund Burke
I think what we are seeing is a fracturing of the Republican Party. The Hard right Christians AKA Tea Party, were blown out early. In areas dominated by Christians, Santorum is their next choice. Gingrich represents "Old, Rich, White guy" faction. Those who are worried that old world money, European roots, are loosing power and are afraid of the poor. Romney represents the elite rich and Ron Paul is leading the faction of Libertarians.
Because none of these have shown an ability to capture a majority, Ron Paul remains viable, especially in light of a possible brokered convention. As a legitimate candidate, with a definite constituency, it seems like censorship would only serve as a political statement in and of itself.
But even if that were not the case, I am against closing a thread simply because someone thinks everything that can be said, has been said.
Elizabeth
The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched - they must be felt with the heart - Helen Keller
Challenge Authority
You convinced me Elizabeth, it will stay open.
And who said I could not change my mind, why would I, I like the one I have.
River
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Edmund Burke
Rather than close it, why not leave it open for moi to post in it? The rest of us can ignore the thread. The trick is to never to respond to any of his posts in the thread; better still...don't read them either.
There is nothing good or bad but thinking makes it so.
Slammr
Re: Dr. Ron Paul, 2012?
It would be good to see them FRACTURE. They have been CRACKED for years....
Slammr,
That is what makes moi's threads that he starts so long. We do not have Dick Nixon to kick around now, so moi makes a suitable surrogate.
So kick away, good buddy!
__________________
(See the Avatar above)
(OR, Click below)
It's the NEW CONSERVATIVE Body Modification Craze...
You guys be nice, remember no slamming fellow members, I know, but just don't.
River
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Edmund Burke
If members no longer find a thread interesting, they'll just stop posting. Problem solved. That's the way it's always been. People don't need to be told what they find interesting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
